Home › Guides › SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2: which do you need?
SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2: which do you need?
Last checked: 2026-10-16
A Type 1 report describes whether your controls are suitably designed at a point in time. A Type 2 report also tests whether they operated effectively over an observation period, commonly 3–12 months. Buyers generally value Type 2 more (editorial) unverified.
| Type 1 | Type 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| What it tests | Control design at one date | Design and operating effectiveness over a period |
| Observation period | None | Commonly 3–12 months |
| Total time | About 2–6 months (sources vary) | About 6–15 months (sources vary) |
| Audit fee (third-party) | $7,500–$60,000 (Drata); $10,000–$25,000 typical (TrustNet) | $12,000–$100,000+ (Drata); $20,000–$60,000 typical (TrustNet) |
Timing and fee ranges come from third parties; see SOC 2 timeline and cost for sources. unverified
Trust Services Criteria
Both report types can cover the AICPA's five Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality and Privacy. Security is the baseline most startups begin with.
Which first?
- Need something for a pending deal fast: a Type 1 can bridge, if the customer accepts it.
- Customer security questionnaire asks for Type 2: plan the observation window early.
- Ask whether your auditor can price both together.
The AICPA has publicly cautioned that promises of "fast and easy" SOC reports threaten their credibility (AICPA), so evaluate auditors, not just speed.
Related: SOC 2 checklist for startups · SOC 2 cost for startups · SOC 2 platforms
Affiliate disclosure: AuditPicks may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no cost to you. No affiliate programs are active yet, and order is not ranked by commission. See our disclosure. Not affiliated with the AICPA; SOC 2 is a mark of the AICPA.